Is your cloud bill growing, your architecture becoming harder to operate, or your team spending too much time maintaining existing systems? We connect costs, applications and how your team works to identify improvements worth investing in.
Spending is increasing without a clear link to traffic, usage or product value.
You are weighing optimization, migration or a rewrite without enough evidence to choose.
Maintenance, incidents and manual tasks consume a substantial share of your team’s capacity.
You need realistic priorities that fit your availability requirements and budget.
A view of the whole system
Cloud: billing, cost allocation, resource usage, storage, data transfers and non-production environments.
Applications: queries, processing, dependencies and architectural choices that drive operating costs.
Scaling and reliability: actual load, capacity headroom, service objectives and behavior during demand spikes.
Processes and teams: ownership, manual work, organization and team sizing relative to business needs. Management decisions remain yours.
Examples of possible interventions
Identify unused resources, rightsize capacity and schedule development environments to stop when they are not needed.
Review an expensive query, redundant processing or a caching strategy before adding servers.
Compare pricing commitments against stable usage, accounting for duration and flexibility constraints.
Clarify who tracks costs, who approves changes and which indicators reveal unexpected increases.
What you receive
A focused assessment documenting the data reviewed, assumptions and scope limitations.
3–5 recommendations prioritized by potential impact, effort, dependencies and risk.
An actionable plan covering next decisions, proposed owners and checks required before implementation.
A findings walkthrough that gives leadership and engineering a shared understanding of the trade-offs.
How the engagement works
1. Scope: define objectives, included systems, access and operational constraints.
2. Assess: connect billing, available metrics, architecture and conversations with your team.
3. Prioritize: separate achievable improvements from changes requiring further investigation.
4. Walk through findings: present the assessment and plan. Implementation and follow-up can be scoped as a separate engagement.
Measure results and trade-offs
Define a baseline with an explicit period and scope; track costs alongside usage volumes.
Separate observed savings from estimates and account for traffic, pricing and currency changes.
Check effects on latency, availability and operational workload; plan rollback for sensitive changes.
Results depend on your starting point and the changes selected. No savings percentage is guaranteed.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to change cloud providers?
Not necessarily. We first examine what drives costs and operational difficulties. Migration is an option to compare with improving existing systems, including its costs and risks.
What access is needed?
Access depends on scope: billing exports, metrics, documentation and, where needed, read access to code or configuration. We favor limited access; production changes are scoped separately.
What does the CAD 2,900 price cover?
The introductory price covers a focused review of an agreed scope, 3–5 recommendations and a findings walkthrough. Taxes apply. A full transformation or implementation of fixes is not implicitly included.
Is 36% a target for my business?
No. This is a historical result from our prior professional experience. Improvement potential will be assessed using your data, without applying that figure to your situation.
Let’s discuss your costs and priorities.
Tell us which systems are involved, what concerns you and which decisions you need to make. We can then define a review suited to that context.
ARTEMIS LAB